Jump to navigation

Rubio deals hammer blow to US aid

An executive order from President imposes a 90-day freeze on most foreign funding – except military aid

Within hours of entering the White House, President Donald Trump issued an executive order for a three-month freeze on all foreign aid. This move seemed certain to result in major cuts to the US$68 billion annual US foreign aid budget and the $8bn allocated by the Biden administration in aid for sub-Saharan Africa in 2024.

However, officials say privately that the directive issued by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, interpreting Trump’s order, is far more radical than they had anticipated (AC Vol 66 No 2, America first but Africa where?).

Rubio issued a ‘stop-work’ memorandum to all US agencies on 24 January and its scope applies both to ongoing and future projects. The only exceptions are military aid to Israel and Egypt, and US contributions to emergency food assistance.

‘No new funds shall be obligated for new awards or extensions of existing awards until each proposed new award or extension has been reviewed and approved,’ says the memo to staff.

Senior diplomats issued the ‘stop-work’ instructions to embassy and local agency staff on 25 January, Africa Confidential has learned.

That may have long-lasting implications for US aid programmes even if most initiatives are unfrozen in April and major job cuts, particularly in US Agency for International Development, are now expected.

Elsewhere, the US withdrawal from the World Health Organization, which leaves a $1.2bn budget hole, is expected to have an immediate impact on the response to the mpox pandemic in central Africa.

While Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officials briefed last week that they do not expect their own programmes to be significantly affected, Africa CDC’s Ngashi Ngongo told journalists that the loss of US funding means that ‘it is time for some of the African member states to think the financing of public health’.



Related Articles

America first but Africa where?

Deal-making diplomacy and geopolitical rivalry with China will dominate Washington’s policy in Africa

Many African leaders believe they can do business with new US President Donald Trump despite his previous lack of interest in the continent. A chorus of congratulatory messages...


New pressure on Beijing

China is caught in the escalating fight over oil revenues between Sudan and South Sudan. Its newest African partner, President Salva Kiir Mayardit’s government in Juba, has asserted...


After the pandemic panic, Big Pharma exits Africa

Moderna's mothballing of a $200m vaccine plant has prompted a backlash from politicians and health professionals

When United States' pharmaceutical giant Moderna halted plans for a US$200 million vaccine factory near Nairobi it dealt a double-blow: to Kenya's ambitions as a healthcare manufacturing...


Rival refugees

Those in Africa who'd hoped the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation's bombing of former Yugoslavia presaged a tougher line on rogue states and human rights abusers are disappointed. The...


Ottawa rewrites the diplomatic and commercial rules

A fierce ideological battle is raging over Canada's foreign policy and the balance between its commitments to multilateralism and the United Nations, where it has been a stalwart provider of funds and peacekeepers, and its deepening alliance with its powerful neighbour, the United States.

Canada's once vibrant enthusiasm for Africa is caught in the middle of this argument. In the left corner are the myriad critics of Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government...