Jump to navigation

Rubio deals hammer blow to US aid

An executive order from President imposes a 90-day freeze on most foreign funding – except military aid

Within hours of entering the White House, President Donald Trump issued an executive order for a three-month freeze on all foreign aid. This move seemed certain to result in major cuts to the US$68 billion annual US foreign aid budget and the $8bn allocated by the Biden administration in aid for sub-Saharan Africa in 2024.

However, officials say privately that the directive issued by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, interpreting Trump’s order, is far more radical than they had anticipated (AC Vol 66 No 2, America first but Africa where?).

Rubio issued a ‘stop-work’ memorandum to all US agencies on 24 January and its scope applies both to ongoing and future projects. The only exceptions are military aid to Israel and Egypt, and US contributions to emergency food assistance.

‘No new funds shall be obligated for new awards or extensions of existing awards until each proposed new award or extension has been reviewed and approved,’ says the memo to staff.

Senior diplomats issued the ‘stop-work’ instructions to embassy and local agency staff on 25 January, Africa Confidential has learned.

That may have long-lasting implications for US aid programmes even if most initiatives are unfrozen in April and major job cuts, particularly in US Agency for International Development, are now expected.

Elsewhere, the US withdrawal from the World Health Organization, which leaves a $1.2bn budget hole, is expected to have an immediate impact on the response to the mpox pandemic in central Africa.

While Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officials briefed last week that they do not expect their own programmes to be significantly affected, Africa CDC’s Ngashi Ngongo told journalists that the loss of US funding means that ‘it is time for some of the African member states to think the financing of public health’.



Related Articles

America first but Africa where?

Deal-making diplomacy and geopolitical rivalry with China will dominate Washington’s policy in Africa

Many African leaders believe they can do business with new US President Donald Trump despite his previous lack of interest in the continent. A chorus of congratulatory messages...


China returns to Africa

By Dan Large, Research Director, Africa-Asia Institute, School of Oriental and Africa Studies; Professor Chris Alden, London School of Economics; and Dr Ricardo Soares de Oliveira, St Peter’s College, Oxford. The three have jointly edited a volume of essays entitled ‘China Returns to Africa’ (Christopher Hurst & Co, London, August 2008).

Accelerating China-Africa trade and diplomatic relations are the dominant topic in the Africa-Asia nexus – even if India and Japan have taken the spotlight with grand African summits...


Brussels eyes African energy as it bars Moscow

Pledge to wean the EU from Russia's gas by 2030 will mean changing policy and stepping up investment in Africa

The launch of the European Union's master plan for energy on 9 March was delayed for a week as the war raging in Ukraine forced officials to...


Getting out of the bush

Accountants and managers at the BBC are calling time on the African service and cutting British influence on the continent

The British Broadcasting Corporation’s decision to eviscerate its highly successful African Service looks counterproductive. It is all the more surprising given that Africa is being targeted by well-financed...


Chalo Africa

The Indians are making moves in the diamond market, but will it last forever?

Indian Commerce Minister Jairam Ramesh cut a deal with Endiama, Angola's state-owned diamond company, to facilitate the direct sale of stones to India by mid-2009. India is also...